Whats the big deal?

November 21st, 2008 by Gerald Plessner

Posted in Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Oboma Administration, Ronald Reagan, Uncategorized | Click here to comment »

Whats the big deal about Senator Hillary Rodham Clintons qualifications for the office of Secretary of State?Senator Clinton is probably one of the most recognized persons on earth. In her own career, and as the spouse of an internationally recognized former president, Mrs. Clinton has probably met dozens of leaders from nations around the world. That experience is a valuable asset in helping the Obama administration recapture the good will of both foreign political leaders and the world community as a well.Although Hillary Clinton may be weighing the choice between being Secretary of State or a leader in the U.S. Senate, no one should believe that in some way the office of Secretary of State is an inadequate reward for her many years of service. It is the first seat in the presidents cabinet and it is many times more prestigious that the position of Vice President.

National leaders the world over will eagerly welcome Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. They will want to be seen with her in their own country or at international meetings. Her experience and self-confidence will be valuable in one-on-one conversations with heads of state and in public diplomacy as she appears in other nations.

While the Obama administration will have a number of people able to deal with international issues, it is hard to believe that a president Obama who ran such a disciplined campaign will allow rivalries or competition to damage his efforts.

And whats the big deal about Bill Clintons current activities and travels? It has been reported that he gets as much as $175,000 for a one-hour speech, with most donations going to the Clinton Global Initiative, a non-profit foundation whose goal is: “fostering a shared responsibility to address major global problems”.

Some commentators have expressed concern that the former presidents personal activities might conflict with the new administrations objectives. To the degree that it is closely managed, the former presidents ability to communicate can be made a very positive asset for our America.

Isnt it interesting that two people who began their adult lives together almost broke, and who have worked so tirelessly for the common good, are now being questioned for their income, most of it coming as recognition of their considerable service to humanity. Why do they now find their wealth and income questioned, while other politicians with much greater wealth and relationships with foreign leaders, are almost never assaulted in the same way?

The first president Bush and the soon-to-be former vice president Dick Cheney come to mind. President George H. W. Bush has been involved in the Carlyle Group, a holding company with global interests (including Dunkin Donuts) and deep roots in the Middle East.

The current vice president, though not directly involved as far as we know with his former employer Halliburton, a major vendor to our military, is deeply involved with projects in Iraq and other Middle East countries. Halliburton receives billions for providing “contractors” in Iraq and elsewhere.

Although he is removed from the management of his former firm, vice president Cheney probably still benefits through deferred income from dividends and fees.

And then there is this: A few days after leaving the White House, former president Ronald Reagan flew on a corporate jet to Japan where he gave two speeches for which he was reported to have been paid one million dollars.

Barack Obama is going to assemble his administration in the same way he ran his campaign. With tremendous insight, creative energy and integrity and Hillary Rodham Clinton is entitled to the First Chair in the presidents cabinet if she wants it!

Its not such a big deal!

Did anyone notice?

November 9th, 2008 by Gerald Plessner

Posted in Barack Obama | 22 Comments - Click here to comment »

Did anyone notice that when president-elect Barack Obama speaks about the financial crisis, he speaks in coherent sentences and is able to respond to questions without pausing or a need to consult with an aide? That he doesn’t seem to need a speech writer or notes to explain difficult or complex problems?

With all the other changes that an Obama administration promises, doesn’t that count for something special?

When was the last time that something like that happened? Was it president Clinton who could do that? Or Nixon? Or Kennedy? Or one of the Roosevelts? Franklin? Or Teddy?

In our 21st century world, when issues become more complex each day, where science and technology are so important to our survival, our health and our security, isn’t it good news that we now have a president who can think on his feet?

And isn’t it reassuring that the anti-intellectual know-nothings who have done such terrible damage to our Constitution and the rule of law, who have almost destroyed our economy and our atmosphere, will no longer control our ecological and atmospheric future?

Did anyone notice? And does it matter?

Damned right it matters! And in the longer term it might be the most important lasting benefit of the Barack Obama presidency.

Why John McCane can’t end the war on Iraq

June 9th, 2008 by Gerald Plessner

Posted in Barack Obama, Election 2008, John McCain, War on Iraq | Click here to comment »

If you believe that John McCain can remove our troops from Iraq and transfer security to the Iraqi government and its military at any point in his presidency, you need a wake-up call!

And if you believe that a McCane presidency will be able to reduce our military commitments around the world or significantly improve our relations with friendly nations you may be in for a whole bunch of disappointments.

A new McCane presidency will be confronted with dozens of neo-conservative war hawks planted in the White House, the Defense and State Departments. They are avid in seeing America increase and extend its imperial footprint around the globe and especially in the oil rich Middle East.

A new administration — McCane or Obama — will not be able to replace those operatives fast enough to completely stop them from advancing the disastrous initiative they created in the Bush administration.

And some of those people, because they are vital to daily operations or because they have powerful benefactors, will inevitably be allowed to stay on to “insure a smooth transition”. Its how the system works.

Then there are the American oil companies and their partners in the Arab world; Dick Cheney and his buddies who want to secure control over Iraq’s oil exports.

The Bush administration’s negotiations to secure 50 permanent American bases in Iraq is intended to secure that source of supply and profits for American companies.

If George W. Bush is able to create a document that our Congress might approve, then he will have established generations-long American imperialism and the neo-conservatives will have achieved their original goal. Then the United States will be burdened with running an imperial empire to support international corporations, and American military men and women will continue to die unnecessarily for generations.

But there’s more. The oil industry will be followed by other corporations eager to keep the war machine alive. John McCane can talk about being a maverick but he is going to need money — lots of money — to finance his campaign. And he will take it gladly from all sorts of corporations that have an interest in providing military supplies, hardware, security services in war zones, along our borders and elsewhere.

There are also the research and development companies at work on new military hardware, much of it untested and outdated even before it is finally designed.

Although many of those programs have bloated budgets, questionable value and poor management, you can be sure that lobbyists and Members of Congress who want Federal money spent in their districts will pressure a McCane administration to show its gratitude to the people who helped finance his campaign.

And when it comes to reducing our troop strength in Iraq or withdrawing entirely, which will never happen in a Republican administration, a President John McCane would be acting against everything his party and he, through his entire adult life, has stood for.

And that ain’t gonna happen!

(You can comment on Gerald Plessner’s comments at his BLOG at geraldplessner.com.)

Well, now you know

March 31st, 2008 by Gerald Plessner

Posted in Barack Obama, Election 2008, Race & Class, Religion | Click here to comment »

Black people are still upset about what our ancestors did to their ancestors 150 years ago. Well, now you know.What’s more, they are still upset about how they were treated after the Civil War, when Jim Crow laws and punishments festered all over the land and thousands of American black men were lynched (hanged from trees, burned alive, tortured and murdered) and two entire generations of African Americans were held in post Civil War economic bondage. Well, now you know.And African Americans are still upset because their good men are treated like criminals even when they are veterans, university-educated professionals or multi-millionaire movie actors who are still stopped by police for DWB (Driving While Black).Well, now you know!

But you think they should just get over it? Should my fellow Jewish Americans just get over what Hitler and his German followers did to our people in the Holocaust?

Should Armenian-Americans just get over what the Turks did to their ancestors a century ago?

Should we just not care about the hatred spewed by religious zealots against our young people who might have a life style those bigots detest but that their God or heredity or evolution made our young people who they are?

Isn’t it time to begin to understand and appreciate the histories, cultures and concerns of all American ethnic groups? This country, like no other in human history, has taken in the persecuted, the hated and the dispossessed from around the world and we did this while limiting the horizons of our own African American underclass. Shouldn’t we be concerned about that after more than 225 years of history?

And finally (I hope) should we be angry about the thinly-veiled hate speech spread across the land by people like Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Glen Beck, Sean Hannity or Dennis Prager against African Americans, liberals and others as they attack Barack Obama?

Now that most talk show loud-mouths are again comfortable attacking and ridiculing African-Americans, not even bothering to screen their bigotry, should we be angry because they make big money keeping your uncle Henry angry by spreading fear and hatred?

Think about the words of Barak Obama’s pastor, saying “God damned America” for sins he believes we committed against African Americans. Then pause for a moment and reflect on the words of the white Evangelical Pat Robertson, who said that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were caused by God’s anger at America for abortion and our disrespect for Him. Wasn’t Pat Robertson saying that God damned America?  At lleast he seemed to be spreading the idea that God should do so.

Did the radio talking heads or any respected Republican condemn Pat Robertson or Jerry Fallwell who said much the same thing?  Or is there a double standard when it comes to bigotry too?

Republican candidates — Dan Quayle Redux?

June 9th, 2007 by Gerald Plessner

Posted in Barack Obama, Election 2008, George Bush, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani | Click here to comment »

Eight of the ten guys running for the Republican nomination for president make Dan Quayle, Clarence Thomas and George W. Bush look like geniuses. Only John McCain and Rudy Giuliani have any claim to national leadership and those claims are beginning to look increasingly weak.John McCain, though beloved and deserving of our thanks for his sacrifices and dedication, is beyond the job in years and gravitas. His submission to humiliation by the Bush White House and his advocacy of an increased war effort in Iraq make him look too weak on one hand and too wrong on the other.

Rudy Giuliani’s hard-boiled approach is appealing to many Republican voters but too many Americans don’t believe that the president’s war on terrorism has made us any safer. His unattractiveness to the Republican religious right may remain a real problem for Giuliani.

McCain and Giuliani may be up to the task but, when compared to the Democratic candidates, the rest of this group looks like a gang that can’t think straight. Read the rest of this entry »